1968 Abarth OT vs. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1968 Abarth OT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 370 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth OT | 1965 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | OT | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1968 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1944 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 54 L |