1968 Abarth OT vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1992 Rover 216 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,944 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Abarth OT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 216 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Because 1968 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth OT | 1992 Rover 216 | |
| Make | Abarth | Rover |
| Model | OT | 216 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1944 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |
