1968 Abarth OT vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth OT | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | OT | FTO |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1944 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1300 mm |