1968 Abarth OT vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1640 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth OT | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Abarth | Rolls-Royce |
Model | OT | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1944 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 322 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 100 L |