1968 Abarth OT vs. 2002 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 844 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth OT | 2002 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | OT | XLR |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1944 cc | 4570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 316 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 68 L |