1968 Abarth OT vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Because 1968 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Abarth OT | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Abarth | Mazda |
| Model | OT | 6 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1944 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |
