1968 Abarth OT vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Abarth OT would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 990 kg more than 1968 Abarth OT.
Because 1968 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Abarth OT | 2011 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | OT | Endeavor |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1944 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4846 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1768 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 81 L |