1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 1958 Saab 92B
To start off, 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Saab 92B would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 1958 Saab 92B | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | 1750 | 92B |
Year Released | 1968 | 1958 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |