1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2000 Kia Clarus
To start off, 2000 Kia Clarus is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2000 Kia Clarus | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
| Model | 1750 | Clarus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
