1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo 1750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo 1750 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 1750 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1925 mm |