1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 2,583 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 (163 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 should accelerate faster than 2006 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600. (220 Nm). This means 2006 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alfa Romeo 2600 | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
| Model | 2600 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2583 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
