1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo (227 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 147 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | 1951 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | Carabo | K2 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
