1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1985 Mercury Sable is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 2,937 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Sable weights approximately 352 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | Carabo | Sable |
Year Released | 1968 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2937 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |