1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar

To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo (227 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 467 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. (211 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo 1994 Ford Aerostar
Make Alfa Romeo Ford
Model Carabo Aerostar
Year Released 1968 1994
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2978 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 227 HP 133 HP
Engine RPM 9000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 211 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 6000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1048 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1000 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3030 mm