1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 1997 Honda Integra
To start off, 1997 Honda Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo (227 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1997 Honda Integra. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo should accelerate faster than 1997 Honda Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda Integra weights approximately 151 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | 1997 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Honda |
| Model | Carabo | Integra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2570 mm |
