1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo weights approximately 338 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo has manual transmission. 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | 1999 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Carabo | Minica |
Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 655 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1048 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2350 mm |