1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo (227 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2011 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo (211 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo Carabo | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | Carabo | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 211 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2685 mm |