1968 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo GT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 205 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Alfa Romeo GT. (140 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Alfa Romeo GT.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo GT | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
Model | GT | Cooper |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 50 L |