1968 Alfa Romeo Junior vs. 1977 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1977 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 940 kg more than 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior.
Because 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1977 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior has manual transmission. 1968 Alfa Romeo Junior will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1977 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Alfa Romeo Junior | 1977 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Junior | DeVille |
Year Released | 1968 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 6030 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3090 mm |