1968 Alpine A 110 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1968 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1968 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alpine A 110 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 110 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 2833 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2580 mm |
