1968 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alpine A 110 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 (50 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1968 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 should accelerate faster than 1968 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1968 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1968 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Alpine | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A 110 | M72 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
