1968 Alpine A 110 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1968 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1968 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1968 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alpine A 110 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A 110 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3270 mm |
