1968 Alpine A 110 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1968 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Alpine A 110.
Because 1968 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Alpine A 110 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A 110 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |
