1968 AMC AMX vs. 1961 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1968 AMC AMX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1961 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1961 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 148 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 1961 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | AMC | Dodge |
| Model | AMX | Polara |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 5907 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2960 mm |
