1968 AMC AMX vs. 1962 Mini MK I

To start off, 1968 AMC AMX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 AMC AMX weights approximately 762 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 515 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I. 1968 AMC AMX has automatic transmission and 1962 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1962 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 AMC AMX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: