1968 AMC AMX vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 AMC AMX weights approximately 607 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | AMC | Zastava |
| Model | AMX | 102 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |
