1968 AMC AMX vs. 1990 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1990 Ford Falcon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1990 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Falcon weights approximately 43 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Falcon. (235 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 1990 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | AMX | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 3157 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |
