1968 AMC AMX vs. 1992 Italdesign Columbus
To start off, 1992 Italdesign Columbus is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Italdesign Columbus. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1992 Italdesign Columbus.
Because 1992 Italdesign Columbus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Italdesign Columbus. (450 Nm). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Italdesign Columbus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 1992 Italdesign Columbus | |
| Make | AMC | Italdesign |
| Model | AMX | Columbus |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 105.8 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 6000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3830 mm |
