1968 AMC AMX vs. 1998 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1998 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1998 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 328 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 1998 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | AMC | Cadillac |
| Model | AMX | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 4598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1950 mm |
