1968 AMC AMX vs. 2000 Lada 110
To start off, 2000 Lada 110 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 AMC AMX weights approximately 347 kg more than 2000 Lada 110.
Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1968 AMC AMX has automatic transmission and 2000 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2000 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 AMC AMX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2000 Lada 110 | |
Make | AMC | Lada |
Model | AMX | 110 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |