1968 AMC AMX vs. 2001 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2001 Dodge Durango is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2001 Dodge Durango. (233 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2001 Dodge Durango. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Durango weights approximately 598 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Because 2001 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Dodge Durango. (399 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2001 Dodge Durango | |
Make | AMC | Dodge |
Model | AMX | Durango |
Year Released | 1968 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 4702 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 399 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2950 mm |