1968 AMC AMX vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (353 Nm). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 AMC AMX | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
| Make | AMC | Toyota |
| Model | AMX | FCHV 5 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6386 cc | 2981 cc |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 576 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1701 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 2720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |
