1968 AMC AMX vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (266 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 563 kg more than 1968 AMC AMX.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (450 Nm). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | AMC | Jeep |
Model | AMX | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 266 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |