1968 AMC AMX vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (127 Nm). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | AMC | Renault |
Model | AMX | Megane |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 70 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2690 mm |