1968 AMC AMX vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 AMC AMX weights approximately 933 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | AMC | Westfield |
Model | AMX | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1377 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |