1968 AMC AMX vs. 2006 Holden Epica

To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.

Because 1968 AMC AMX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 AMC AMX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica. 1968 AMC AMX has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 AMC AMX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: