1968 AMC AMX vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac SRX. (252 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac SRX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac SRX. (254 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
1968 AMC AMX | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | AMX | SRX |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6386 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 576 Nm | 254 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |