1968 Audi 100 vs. 1959 Holden FE
To start off, 1968 Audi 100 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Audi 100 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Audi 100 should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Audi 100 weights approximately 112 kg more than 1959 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 150 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Audi 100 | 1959 Holden FE | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 100 | FE |
Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2670 mm |