1968 Audi 100 vs. 2007 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1968 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi 100.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi 100. (150 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Audi 100 | 2007 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 100 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 90.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 82 L |