1968 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1968 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 600 kg more than 1968 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi 100. (150 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi 100. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1968 Audi 100 has manual transmission. 1968 Audi 100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Audi 100 2009 Dodge Charger
Make Audi Dodge
Model 100 Charger
Year Released 1968 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1760 cc 3518 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 100 HP 250 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 339 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.7:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1092 kg 1692 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]