1968 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1968 Audi 100. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi 100. (150 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Audi 100 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | 100 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1760 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
