1968 Audi 100 vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1968 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 238 kg more than 1968 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Audi 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Audi 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Matrix (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi 100. (150 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Audi 100 | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 50 L |