1968 Audi 100 vs. 2012 Citroen C4
To start off, 2012 Citroen C4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,760 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Audi 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C4 (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1968 Audi 100. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C4 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1968 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Audi 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Audi 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C4 (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi 100. (150 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Audi 100 | 2012 Citroen C4 | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | 100 | C4 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1760 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 85.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |