1968 Audi Super 90 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1968 Audi Super 90. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Audi Super 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 498 kg more than 1968 Audi Super 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Audi Super 90. (147 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Audi Super 90. 2003 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1968 Audi Super 90 has manual transmission. 1968 Audi Super 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Audi Super 90 2003 Ford Mustang
Make Audi Ford
Model Super 90 Mustang
Year Released 1968 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 87 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81.5 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 980 kg 1478 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 53 L 68 L