1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1946 Simca 8
To start off, 1968 Austin 3-Litre is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1946 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 566 kg more than 1946 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 1946 Simca 8 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | 3-Litre | 8 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2430 mm |