1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1955 DKW F 89
To start off, 1968 Austin 3-Litre is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 630 kg more than 1955 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin 3-Litre | 1955 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | 3-Litre | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2360 mm |
