1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1968 Austin 3-Litre is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 280 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Austin 3-Litre | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 3-Litre | Master RR |
Year Released | 1968 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2540 mm |