1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1973 Citroen SM
To start off, 1973 Citroen SM is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1968 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Citroen SM (233 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (219 Nm). This means 1973 Citroen SM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin 3-Litre | 1973 Citroen SM | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | 3-Litre | SM |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 219 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 86.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2960 mm |
