1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX

To start off, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 124 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 330 kg more than 1979 Nissan 260 ZX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Austin 3-Litre (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Nissan 260 ZX. (189 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Nissan 260 ZX.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Austin 3-Litre 1979 Nissan 260 ZX
Make Austin Nissan
Model 3-Litre 260 ZX
Year Released 1968 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2565 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 219 Nm 189 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1290 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2610 mm