1968 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1982 Ferrari 126
To start off, 1982 Ferrari 126 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ferrari 126 (573 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 449 more horse power than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ferrari 126 should accelerate faster than 1968 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 Ferrari 126.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Austin 3-Litre | 1982 Ferrari 126 | |
| Make | Austin | Ferrari |
| Model | 3-Litre | 126 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 573 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2120 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2660 mm |
